Financing
We offer unfair advantages to benefit from private and public financing opportunities
Open Innovation Calls
Benefit from our close collaboration with a network of private investors to support your growth.
Start-up mode®
Tap into our expertise to assist your team in creating new value propositions and product concepts.
Deal flow
Connect with leading organizations to activate collaboration and investment opportunities.
Private Financing
Benefit from our network of private investors with whom we work in close collaboration.
Open Innovation Calls
Benefit from our close collaboration with a network of private investors to support your growth.
Get Ready for the Chips Venture Forum
Open discussion with INPHO Venture Summit
Click on one of the links below to discover their insights:
We are delighted to share with you a curated selection of podcasts and webinars highlighting the most impactful topics in semiconductors.
This webinar presents the CHIPS Venture Forum: a Europe-wide initiative to build collaboration between semiconductor startups, investors, and corporates.
It explains how to apply, the support offered by Competence Centres, the selection process, and the timeline leading up to SEMICON Europa.
You’ll also learn about the investors and corporates joining the initiative, their tech focus areas, and how BLUMORPHO and aCCCess work together to contribute to a strong and sovereign European value chain.
Benhamou Global Ventures is a leading fund with + $2 BN raised, more than 50 companies in portfolio. Eric Benhamou, former CEO of 3Com and Palm Pilot, with 8 IPOs and 37 M&As under his belt, is looking for this discussion and will share his insights on the most promising deeptech investment opportunities in 2025 and beyond. Eric brings a unique perspective on emerging trends and strategic opportunities.
As a follow-up to the INPHO® Venture Summit discussions on What’s next to invest in DeepTech?, we have identified topics to be challenged.
The discussion was introduced by Géraldine Andrieux, who set the stage by providing context for the conversation and explaining its relevance. Both she and Eric Benhamou play active roles on the editorial committee of the INPHO Venture Summit, helping to shape crucial conversations about the future of deep tech investment. She acknowledged Eric’s presence and the pleasure of having him taking part to this conversation.
She also extended a warm welcome to all the participants, with a special mention of François Breniaux from Supernova Invest, Christian Claussel from Ventech VC, Emmanuel Daugeras from Karista VC, Marc Lambrechts from Capricorn Partners, Anne Lebreton-Wolf from ALW Finance & Innovation and Rémy de Tonnac from ETF Partners.
This conversation is the result of a discussion started during previous INPHO Venture Summit editions regarding the challenges of pinpointing ‘what’s next’ in deep tech investment. Just a few months ago, in October 2024, the last INPHO Venture Summit, focused on identifying the next big opportunities in deep tech. Since then, so much has unfolded. The objective of the discussion is not only to join INPHO participants but also key stakeholders from across the French and European innovation ecosystems, which promises a particularly exciting and diverse discussion.
Géraldine Andrieux: Eric, could you share your thoughts on what’s next for deep tech investment? Given our discussions at INPHO and the rapid evolution of AI and other technologies, what are the key trends shaping the landscape?
Eric Benhamou: Since our last discussion in Bordeaux, one of the most significant developments in AI has been the introduction of the DeepSeek-R1 model in January. This was a major milestone for several reasons.
First, it marks a breakthrough from a Chinese company, demonstrating deep innovation not just in software but also in hardware. It reinforces the idea that simply increasing computing power isn’t enough to drive AI forward; smart innovation in architecture plays an equally crucial role. DeepSeek has delivered a significant leap in performance while simultaneously reducing costs, proving that strategic advancements can be just as powerful as raw computational force.
Another key factor is DeepSeek’s commitment to open-source AI. By making its model open-weight, DeepSeek is accelerating AI deployment, particularly in enterprise applications. This isn’t an isolated case. In recent weeks, we’ve seen similar or even greater advancements from Chinese tech giants like Alibaba and Baidu.
This underscores the intensifying global competition in AI, with the U.S., China, and Europe all vying for leadership. China’s research ecosystem, despite restrictions on NVIDIA’s most sophisticated GPUs, has produced world-class advancements. Instead of using H100 GPUs, they have worked with H800 chips, which have lower chip-to-chip bandwidth but have compensated through algorithmic improvements such as quantization and reinforcement learning with reduced human input. Overall, these developments are significant and signal a positive trajectory for AI innovation worldwide.
Rémy de Tonnac: However, Europe, has yet to fully position itself. While companies like Mistral AI show promise, large-scale collective investments similar to an “Airbus of AI” have not materialized. This leaves Europe at a competitive disadvantage compared to the U.S. and China.
Rémy de Tonnac: A few weeks after the DeepSeek “tsunami,” have we started to understand if the DeepSeek architecture design is indeed significantly different from what has been done before? Does it inherently offer a huge advantage?
Eric Benhamou: There’s broad agreement that the innovations introduced by DeepSeek represent a high-quality breakthrough, reflecting the caliber of their scientists. The innovations fall into two categories: hardware and software.
On the hardware side, the key focus is finding ways around the limitations of not having access to the latest GPUs, particularly when it comes to chip-to-chip bandwidth. DeepSeek’s approach to reducing the amount of data traffic between chips is a key innovation. One such technique is quantization, which allows for faster matrix multiplications, core to AI processes, by reducing the precision of calculations. Essentially, you can drop off the last few digits in calculations, cutting down on computational cost and data movement without sacrificing significant accuracy. This drastically reduces the cost of compute and sidesteps the need for advanced chips.
On the software side, DeepSeek has made significant strides in training efficiency. Training with human feedback (like reinforcement learning) is expensive, so finding ways to reduce the need for extensive human input can save considerable costs. DeepSeek has excelled at this, and much of their software innovation has been published in research papers. The great thing is that these software techniques are available for anyone to use. The hardware innovations are proprietary, but the software advancements are open for the industry.
I think this is a step-function innovation for the AI field, and I believe it will benefit the industry overall. I haven’t looked deeply into the more recent Chinese models from Alibaba and Baidu, but I suspect their approaches are similar, given the competitive landscape.
Christian Claussel: There has been some controversy surrounding DeepSeek, with questions about whether it truly lives up to expectations. Some initial skepticism impacted stock markets, but the concerns seemed to fade over time.
Eric Benhamou: DeepSeek is definitely not a scam and should be taken very seriously. Their team consists of top-tier, highly reputable researchers, and their work has been peer-reviewed. However, there have been discussions about whether some of their training data was acquired under questionable circumstances. In China, where copyright laws are less strict, data access can be more flexible, which might give them an advantage in training efficiency.
What’s also notable is how DeepSeek has been perceived as a real competitive threat. Companies like OpenAI have reportedly sought legal measures to limit its distribution, which is a strong indication that they see it as a viable rival. Rather than blocking access, it would be more constructive for OpenAI to highlight why their model is superior, but instead, we’re seeing restrictions on DeepSeek models entering the U.S. market. This underscores the global battle for AI dominance.
Anne Lebreton-Wolf: In today’s geopolitical landscape, Sovereignty in AI is a growing concern, more critical than ever. How do you see this shaping AI development?
Eric Benhamou: AI sovereignty is crucial. Training advanced models requires access to vast datasets. China enjoys a strategic advantage here, as its regulatory environment allows nearly unrestricted data access. Meanwhile, strict copyright laws in the West significantly increase training costs.
This naturally raises sovereignty concerns: If AI is truly a matter of national security and economic independence, as many believe, then placing such high costs on model training in the West could drive innovation elsewhere, potentially making us dependent on AI systems developed under entirely different values and biases.
Then there’s the question of regulation. In Europe, for example, the EU AI Act introduces strict compliance requirements for high-risk AI systems. While well-intentioned, some argue that these regulations stifle innovation and impose unnecessary costs too early, which could further disadvantage European AI players.
At the same time, the global AI landscape is becoming increasingly fragmented. Rising trade barriers and geopolitical tensions are leading to isolated AI ecosystems in the US, Europe, China, and other regions. As a result, companies may find it easier—or simply more cost-effective—to train their models in jurisdictions with fewer restrictions, which could influence the way AI develops worldwide.
Ultimately, while everyone agrees that AI is one of the most critical technological innovations of our generation, the landscape is far from even. Sovereignty in AI is about much more than just technological leadership—it’s about economic resilience, security, and control over the future of intelligence itself.
Géraldine Andrieux: AI is evolving rapidly, and we’re seeing the emergence of agentic AI. Eric, could you explain why this is significant?
Eric Benhamou: Agentic AI refers to models that can reason, set goals, break them down into manageable steps, and determine the best course of action through chain-of-thought reasoning. This evolution enables AI-driven agents to go beyond automation; they can interact with existing IT systems, access databases, and participate in process automation—not in a rigid, robotic manner, but with adaptive, reasoning-based intelligence.
This transformation was already underway, but the acceleration of AI models, now cheaper, more accessible, and increasingly capable, has made agentic AI even more viable. This creates a landscape where AI agents and human agents collaborate. AI agents will be auditable. We can track what they do, when they access data, and how they use it. This transparency is crucial for enterprise adoption.
Emmanuel Daugeras: Today, most large language models rely on statistical pattern recognition rather than true understanding of the physical world. There’s growing interest in “physically informed machine learning,” where AI derives differential equations from physical observations. Do you see this as the next big disruption in AI?
Eric Benhamou: Absolutely. Real-world models, those that reflect the physical environment—are key to advancing AI, particularly in robotics. The paradox is that while AI can now solve complex mathematical problems at a PhD level, it still struggles to manipulate objects as well as a toddler. A three-year-old can handle objects with greater dexterity than the most advanced robots today.
This capability gap needs to be closed. Integrating real-world models will be crucial for AI to navigate and interact with its environment more effectively. Back in the 1960s, people envisioned household robots capable of handling daily chores. Yet, even now, we lack robots that can load a dishwasher without breaking plates. This highlights the limitations of current AI and the need for more advanced real-world learning approaches.
Rémy de Tonnac: I completely agree. While the big infrastructure plays are largely dominated by tech giants, the real opportunity for VCs lies in applications leveraging agentic AI to drive productivity gains across industries.
Eric Benhamou: While AI remains a major focus, other deep-tech areas like space and defense are becoming increasingly important. In Europe, significant investments are being directed toward defense, particularly in drone warfare strategies and fleet coordination. Innovations in autonomous systems are shaping modern military tactics, making this a key area for technological advancement.
Space tech is another rapidly evolving field. From reusable rockets to space-based materials research and cyber defense for satellite payloads, there are countless opportunities. Companies working on Space Situational Awareness (SSA) are tackling challenges like collision detection using AI-driven pattern mapping rather than traditional computationally expensive methods.
Emmanuel Daugeras: We’re actively investing in dual-use space tech and defense infrastructure. The demand for AI-powered solutions in these areas is growing, and we’re seeing strong traction. The number of satellites is set to double within a few years, making space traffic management a critical challenge.
Christian Claussel: One of our portfolio companies is developing a Eurocontrol-like system for satellites, helping to manage space traffic. As payloads increase, AI-driven solutions for collision avoidance will become essential.
Rémy de Tonnac: From a VC perspective, we consider that quantum computing is probably the only area in deep tech where Europe has a real competitive edge. Google’s recent Willow announcement demonstrated a quantum leap—completing computations in five minutes that would take traditional supercomputers trillions of years.
Quantum will revolutionize fields like materials science, chemistry, and genetics. While direct investments in quantum infrastructure may be beyond the typical VC horizon, the real opportunity may be in developing the “picks and shovels”. In quantum computing, this could mean developing the tools and software that will accelerate its adoption.
What areas of deep tech hold the most promise for European competitiveness according to you?
Eric Benhamou: Quantum computing is indeed one such area where Europe has a competitive edge. While AI remains a major focus, other deep-tech areas like space and defense are becoming increasingly important. In Europe, significant investments are being directed toward defense, particularly in drone warfare strategies and fleet coordination. Innovations in autonomous systems are shaping modern military tactics, making this a key area for technological advancement.
Space tech is another rapidly evolving field. From reusable rockets to space-based materials research and cyber defense for satellite payloads, there are countless opportunities.
Emmanuel Daugeras: We’re actively investing in dual-use space tech and defense infrastructure. The demand for AI-powered solutions in these areas is growing, and we’re seeing strong traction. The number of satellites is set to double within a few years, making space traffic management a critical challenge. Companies working on Space Situational Awareness (SSA) for example are tackling challenges like collision detection using AI-driven pattern mapping rather than traditional computationally expensive methods.
Christian Claussel: One of our portfolio companies is developing a Eurocontrol-like system for satellites, helping to manage space traffic. As payloads increase – the fleet estimated around 35,000 satellites today is expected to double in just three or four years – AI-driven solutions for collision avoidance will become essential.
Christian Claussel: At Ventech, rather than predicting the next big AI trend, we focus on what AI is already doing today. AI isn’t a sudden revolution—it’s been evolving for decades. I remember visiting a Fraunhofer Lab in 2001 where AI research was already well underway. What has changed is that computing power has finally caught up, allowing AI to reach its full potential. The key question for us is: where do we invest? In infrastructure, software, or new algorithms?
Eric Benhamou: As a VC, we don’t play in the massive infrastructure investment space, so we focus on high-value applications. For example, we wouldn’t make a $10 billion investment in a company like Mistral AI. It’s not that they aren’t competitive, but it’s simply not our swim lane.
Our strategy centers on young companies that leverage AI to drive productivity gains. Right now, the biggest opportunity lies in agentic AI—models that use reasoning-based intelligence rather than just automation. These systems dynamically solve business problems, interacting with IT systems, querying databases, and adapting decisions in real-time.
This creates a new landscape where AI and human agents collaborate. AI agents will be fully auditable, ensuring transparency in how they process data, making them viable for enterprise adoption.
That said, France has some of the world’s best mathematicians, but too many focus on algorithmic research rather than business applications. The real opportunity is in companies applying AI to solve concrete business challenges rather than just developing theoretical models. This is where the best returns will come from.
Emmanuel Daugeras: AI engines, to some extent, face the risk of becoming commoditized. AI engines consume massive amounts of energy and require huge capital expenditures. While they are transformative, how do you see real value being captured in AI?
Eric Benhamou: That’s a fundamental question. What’s the return on AI? While AI innovation is unquestionable, monetizing it remains a challenge.
In our view, the highest returns will come from AI-enabled applications and services. Infrastructure investments, though critical, are mainly reserved for well-funded firms. Companies like Mistral AI are exceptions—they are well-financed and have strong technology—but generally, infrastructure is a game for the tech giants.
AI-enabled services, however, span across industries. Software development, for instance, is already experiencing major transformation. AI-powered coding assistance tools are boosting developer productivity to the point where some Silicon Valley companies have reduced engineering headcount, not due to financial struggles, but because AI has made development more efficient.
Beyond software, customer-facing industries like financial services and insurance are seeing AI-driven automation in customer support and decision-making. These areas will yield the strongest AI-driven productivity gains and financial returns.
Géraldine Andrieux: Climate tech is a critical area. How do you see AI playing a role in energy management?
Eric Benhamou: I think there’s a crucial area of innovation here that many of us can agree on. We now need to harness a wide range of energy generation sources—solar, wind, nuclear (depending on the region), and others—into what we call virtual power plants. These virtual power plants are much more distributed and utilize various forms of energy generation and transportation.
To better manage energy, we need software constructs to pull all of these resources together. For instance, a small community could aggregate all of its solar power from rooftops into one unit, and manage that alongside a larger physical plant somewhere in the region. This requires holistic management in the form of virtual power plants.
AI is going to play a significant role here, improving utilization, balancing loads, and preventing energy waste. While there will certainly be innovations in physical energy generation and storage—areas we still know less about—what we understand more clearly is how to manage these systems efficiently.
This intersection of AI and climate tech is going to be extremely interesting, and it’s something we’ll certainly be paying attention to. In Europe, particularly with the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict and the subsequent shifts in energy sources, including the reevaluation of nuclear power, we’re seeing massive changes. This will result in a more diversified and distributed energy generation base.
The only way to manage this smartly is through virtual power plants. So, there are a lot of interesting problems to solve here, and I think this area is a fertile ground for startups.
Rémy de Tonnac: One of the companies I’ve invested in is already implementing multiple AI models to balance grid efficiency. Quantum computing is also being explored for energy optimization, further enhancing the potential of AI-driven energy management.
Marc Lambrechts: A key focus here is data, especially data quality. In health applications, reliable data sources are crucial for AI systems. I’m particularly interested in Voxel Sensors, one of our portfolio companies, which is developing a hardware solution combining depth sensing with eye scanning to gauge intent or attention. They’re focusing on both hardware and software, ensuring data quality for future visual language models. While major AI players focus on compute power and data volume, Voxel is innovating in data quality, adding unique value.
Eric Benhamou: I agree—data quality is essential for successful AI deployments. AI failures often stem from poor data curation, which hinders model training and insight generation. Improving data quality is critical for AI productivity gains.
Beyond data quality, data governance is vital—ensuring secure access and combating issues like fake news. As the world faces more conflicts and cyber threats, the demand for sophisticated cybersecurity tools will grow. Some threats may involve disinformation campaigns or AI agents posing as humans to disrupt systems.
The cybersecurity market will continue to expand, and while we may face competition in other sectors, its growth is assured. Additionally, space tech presents exciting opportunities, with France being a leader in space technology.
François Breniaux: AI is taking up a significant portion of venture funding. What does this mean for other sectors? Can you be a successful investor today without investing in AI?
Eric Benhamou: While AI dominates headlines, sectors like energy storage, materials science, and healthcare still offer strong investment opportunities.
The VC market is still recovering from the 2022 downturn. In 2021, overinvestment led to inflated valuations and wasteful spending, followed by a sharp correction.
Today, U.S. venture investment levels are similar to those of a decade ago, effectively wiping out years of growth. AI now takes the lion’s share of funding, leaving sectors like climate tech underfunded. However, I anticipate a surge in defense tech and cybersecurity investments in the coming years.
Géraldine expressed her gratitude to Eric for his strong statement, emphasizing the importance of not only considering the technology but also the current state of the VC market and the wealth available in the venture capital world. She thanked Eric for his time and insightful contributions, noting how much they were appreciated. Géraldine also extended her thanks to all the participants for joining the conversation, highlighting how valuable the discussion had been. She concluded by mentioning that the next INPHO Venture Summit will take place in Bordeaux in 2026, inviting everyone to join what promises to be an excellent opportunity to connect with both investors and industry professionals.
Christian Reitberger expresses concerns about a potential future dominated by Nvidia, where all computing services are provided by a few major companies, creating a monopolized and homogenous landscape. He advocates for a more diverse and colorful world, where system integration incorporates various technologies and architectures.
George Ugras shares optimism, citing historical precedents where dominant market shares have been challenged by innovative newcomers.
Régis :
Good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us this afternoon to talk a little bit about the CHIPS Venture Forum.
Today, the objective of this interactive session is to share more, of course, about the initiative itself, what is the process for you to apply, and we will answer all your questions, collect your feedback, and maybe address some specific requests.
This session is recorded, it will be made available on the ACCESS YouTube channel, and the slides will be distributed to attendees.
So I’m Régis Hamelin, I’m the CTO of BLUMORPHO, and I’m the coordinator of the ACCCESS Coordination and Support Action.
This afternoon with me, I have my colleague, Radia.
Radia :
Hi, hello everyone, happy to have you all.
Quick word about myself too, I’m Radia, Innovation Manager at BLUMORPHO, and I work alongside Régis on the ACCESS project.
I’ll be your main point of contact. Please don’t hesitate to reach out if you have any questions, you’ll find my contact details at the end of this webinar.
Before we dive in, just a quick reminder: you’re in an interactive webinar, so feel free to use the little Q&A box to ask your questions along the way. Don’t be shy, ask your hard questions and put our expertise to the test.
And just to show you how interactive we really are, we’d love for you to start by answering a quick poll.
Régis :
Yes, so I’m launching the poll. The question is very simple: are you a startup, scale-up, a cluster, a Competence Centre, a large corporate, or something else? Something else, maybe you don’t fit into any of these categories.
It’s important for us to understand who is in the room.
And we see that for the moment, nearly 75% of the people in the room are startups and scale-ups. So thank you very much for your participation.
Let’s get into it now. Let’s talk about the CHIPS Forum. What we discuss today takes place in the context of the European CHIPS Act.
As you all know, the European CHIPS Act is Europe’s strategic response to the global semiconductor challenge.
It has many objectives, but mostly, it aims at sovereignty and reinforcing a resilient and sustainable value chain.
This is why the ACCESS CSA, in partnership with the EIC and the European Commission and more specifically with DG CONNECT is bringing you this opportunity to meet with investors and corporates.
The objective of DG CONNECT for this initiative is to unlock access to financing beyond Series A.
And for the EIC, it’s also about supporting the EIC portfolio to get access to strategic and financial partners.
We’re going to talk a lot about venture capital investors, but this is not the only purpose of this forum it’s also an opportunity for you to meet with potential clients and large corporates.
Maybe a few words about the Competence Centres.
The Competence Centres are one of the pillars of DG CONNECT’s strategy, in the establishment of a European network. You have one Competence Centre in each Member State.
It’s actually a national innovation hotspot. They have a strategic role.
They serve as a link between advanced research and industrial deployment.
They are designed to accelerate semiconductor development by bringing together researchers and businesses.
The Competence Centres will focus first on small and medium-sized enterprises, and startups are obviously part of that.
There will also be technical support.
What are the services?
You will have technical support, technology transfer… the objective is also to facilitate access to pilot lines, design platforms, and entry.
What is this network?
You will see on this map that you have up to 30 Competence Centres in total.
You can maybe find your country and your Competence Centre.
If you don’t know who is in charge of your Competence Centre, contact us, that’s our job. As ACCCESS, our role is to connect the European Chips Competence Centres, so CCCs in short, the pilot lines, and the design platform, to build the European network of Chips Competence Centres.
So again, 30 Competence Centres, with two in Spain and two in Belgium.
A few words about ACCCESS: we are a Coordination and Support Action. We have seven partners.
BLUMORPHO is coordinator, with CNES, MESAP, MediaLogic, Silicon Alps, Silicon Saxony, and VDI/VDE-IT.
It’s a four-year project. We started in March, with a budget of 4 million euros. You can see on the right a list of associated partners in this initiative.
What are we doing?
We facilitate access to technology and training. We’re going to build catalogs of training and technology offers these initiatives are mostly led by MediaLogic and MESAP.
From the finance and business intelligence side, we want to facilitate access to the CHIPS fund.
We will also organize monthly webinars, we call them the CHIPS Think Tank.
The CHIPS Venture Forum is also an annual event. We will do it every year.
This is the first edition, in November. It’s an introduction to deep tech investors.
On the right, you can see our future website. It’s a platform to facilitate identification of the right partners.
In fact, you’ll have an AI-powered tool, at the bottom right, you can see this button here.
It will be your chatbot, trained with all available content from the Competence Centres.
You’ll be able to ask your questions and find the right partners.
Obviously, the goal at the end is to have a human contact, and for us to make the introductions.
Now that you know a bit more about the motivation, the strategy, the partners and the Competence Centres, I’ll now ask Radia to take over and tell us more about what’s behind the CHIPS Venture Forum, and how to apply.
Radia :
Thank you, Régis.
The CHIPS Venture Forum is brought to you by a network of Competence Centres, in partnership with the EIC Accelerator and DG CONNECT, and in the presence of leading deep tech venture capital investors, corporate ventures and industrial players.
As Régis said, it’s not just a one-off event, it’s an entire process designed to support collaboration and investment.
The first edition will take place in November 2025, during Semicon Europa in Munich.
The exact date will be confirmed soon, but it will be between November 18 and November 21.
The forum is open to startups creating value across the entire semiconductor value chain from materials and chip design to manufacturing, integration and end applications.
The only condition to apply is that your activity is somehow related to semiconductors — even broadly.
We’re keeping the criteria as open as possible both in terms of technology and maturity stage.
So whether you’re pre-seed, seed, Series A, B or C, you’re welcome to apply.
We welcome companies working across the entire semiconductor value chain — from materials to packaging, including process equipment, mainstream silicon technologies, EDA and design automation, packaging and assembly, and others.
What you see on the right, like power electronics, etc., are more specific technology categories.
This is simply to help us organize the meetings more efficiently, based on your profile and area of expertise.
Don’t worry too much about fitting perfectly into one box we’re flexible, and it’s a broad scope, as long as it’s semiconductor-related.
To apply, the only requirement is to fill out the application form.
This form will be shared with investors, and the information you provide will be used to create an investment opportunities portfolio.
Régis will share the link in the chat.
All the questions are standard questions typically asked by investors, but please pay attention to the character limits.
We want the information to be as clear and concise as possible.
The data you provide will also be included in a public booklet, but don’t worry — your slide deck will remain confidential and will only be shared with registered investors.
And if you feel like you don’t exactly match any of the listed categories on the form, just select “Other” and tell us more in your own words.
Regis :
So now a little bit more information about who you’re going to meet.
This first edition is also done in partnership with the INPHO community of investors. INPHO is a community that started about 16 years ago, and you’ll see here that we’ve made a selection for you of organisations that are really interested in everything related to silicon and quantum.
Just a few examples: on the left of this picture, you can see Anne Le Breton, she’s more into early-stage cases and she’s well known among many photonics companies, as she’s an advisor to several of them.
Aymeric Renard from Hardware Club is also known for his investments into analog photonics and gyroscopes, again, in silicon photonics.
Matterwave invests in photonics companies like Akhetonics, Codasip, and Equal1, which is a quantum computing company.
360 Capital Partners invested in fabless companies like NeuroNova and Eye4Near, which works in near-infrared, again, photonics. C12 is also a well-known quantum computing company.
Some corporate ventures like Trumpf Venture, for example, are more interested in how they could use lasers in semiconductor manufacturing. That’s a different kind of positioning.
Airbus Ventures : they are known as Airbus, but it’s not a corporate venture in the traditional sense. It’s more like a traditional VC, and they’ve invested heavily in quantum technologies like C12, IonQ, Q-Ctrl, and QCWare.
And here are more names, we’ll also have people from Bosch Venture Capital, who were among the first to invest in quantum back in 2018.
IMEQ Expand is also known for investments in vertical compute — Wise, which is a gallium nitride circuit — Octalysis, and Celestial AI in photonics.
Deep Tech XL is an early-stage investment fund — the person in this picture is actually a former silicon expert — and they’ve invested in MicroAlign, which does fiber-to-chip coupling.
Again, this community of investors started working together around 16 years ago. They have one main event called the INPHO Venture Forum, which takes place every two years.
Here are a few examples of companies they’ve invested in: Effect Photonics, Prophesee, and Atom Computing. All these companies have been awarded during the INPHO Venture Forum.
So that was just to give you an insight into the investors who will be present in the room.
It won’t be limited to investors, there will also be corporates in the room, because, as we explained, one of the objectives of this forum is not just finance but also business.
Let’s get into the process and the timeline.
Applications to the Chips Financing Forum have been open since July 1st, and will remain open until September 19th.
During this phase, you can already contact your Competence Center. Some of them will provide specific support.
Unfortunately, not all the Competence Centers are fully operational yet, because some are still in the early stages. But in any case, it’s always good for you to reach out to them.
If you don’t know your Competence Center, we’ll be here to introduce you to your partners.
So, during this phase, you go to the application form, fill it in, you can do it in two sessions, but ideally as quickly as possible. That will help us invite the relevant corporates and organise the right matchmaking for you.
As we mentioned, the forum will end with a face-to-face event, but the important part already starts online.
We’ll host a webinar around September to introduce some of the investors, who will explain what they’re looking for, what they expect from companies, and what their strategy is regarding semiconductors.
There will also be online meetings starting in September and continuing through October.
Each applicant will have up to three meetings, with investors or corporates.
During these meetings, a selection will be made, investors will reach a consensus on which companies they’d like to see pitch on stage. Each meeting will be 15 to 20 minutes long. You’ll have five minutes to pitch your case, the format is up to you, with or without slides, and the rest will be Q&A and discussion. Fifteen to twenty minutes is short, but a lot can happen. And remember, the objective is not to sign a deal during these meetings, it’s to move on to the next step.
In October, there will be a one- or two-week period where selected companies will receive pitch training.
The selection will be made by investors, and the training will be provided by BLUMORPHO.
You will be coached to pitch a five-minute talk, that’s the format.
Between 15 and 20 companies will be selected to pitch on stage, depending on the quality of the applicants.
And of course, we’ll finish with the final event, which will take place during SEMICON Europa in Munich.
The exact date is not confirmed yet.
But even if you’re not selected to pitch on stage, you’ll be invited to attend the event for free.
It will be a closed-door event with investors, corporates, and startups.
There will also be representatives from the European Commission and a few Competence Centers.
So what’s going to happen during this event?
There will be 20 companies pitching.
It will run from 9:00 to 17:00, with panels, pitching sessions, and lots of opportunities for networking.
So even if you don’t pitch on stage, you’ll still have opportunities to meet people and connect.
Again, pitching is a bonus, but the meetings and networking you’ll do in advance will already have a lot of value.
After the event, all the information you’ve shared in the application form will be compiled into a catalogue of investment opportunities.
If there are some elements that you don’t want to be published, we will simply correct the form. It will be made available as a downloadable booklet, and there will be some additional elements in it, like the results of the panel’s discussion, for example.
We will also push a lot of communication through the network, and publish some posts and invite you to our webinars.
So that’s it for most of the information we wanted to share with you. We are now ready to take your questions.
I’ll check if there are any questions in the chat. All right.
here’s one specific question about the Competence Centers in Switzerland.
There is no Competence Center in Switzerland, but you can contact us and we’ll discuss this point.
If you don’t have any further questions, we do have one for you. We’d like to know if you plan to apply.
So I’ll launch the second question: do you plan to apply? Yes or no?
If you’re not sure yet, you may also want to have a call with us. And if it’s important for you, feel free to ask a question now about why you’re not sure about applying. We’ll give you some time to answer.
So again: you can apply until the 19th of September.
You will meet investors and corporates between the 19th of September and the 3rd of October.
Then, you’ll enter the selection phase and receive pitch training online.
Around 18 to 20 companies will be selected, but all of you will be invited to the event.
There’s one question: does it matter geographically where in the EU the startup is based?
I would say no, as long as you’re part of the European Union, there’s no problem to participate.
Again, if you’re not sure about your eligibility, the best is to contact us.
What is the role of the Competence Center regarding the application process?
The Competence Centers are directly sourcing startups. You can decide to apply directly via the link.
If you go through your Competence Center, there might be some additional support provided. They can maybe look at your pitch deck or help with travel to Germany if you’re selected.
Each Competence Center will have specific support, and you’ll need to talk to them directly.
I think we’ve covered most of the agenda for today. We recommend that you stay tuned.
We’ll host another session in early September with investors, so they can share why they are interested in semiconductors, what they are expecting, and what they are looking for. That will help you prepare for the meetings and of course your pitching.
And for those of you who selected that you’d like a call with us, don’t hesitate to contact me to hamelin@blumorpho.com or radia@blumorpho.com so we can schedule it.
Thank you everyone, and have a good day.
Bye-bye!
Christian Reitberger highlights two distinct aspects of France: its strong emphasis on nuclear energy and its successful collaboration between major defense players and the startup ecosystem. Christian Reitberger discusses the significance of nuclear energy in France, contrasting it with the preferences of other European countries like Germany. He suggests a lively debate on the necessity of nuclear energy, including Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), to meet energy demands, particularly for industries and data centers. Christian Reitberger also praises France’s model of collaboration between defense corporations and startups, noting its resemblance to successful practices in the United States. He emphasizes the uniqueness of these dynamics and suggests showcasing them at a French conference to provide valuable insights uncommon elsewhere.
CHRISTIAN REITBERGER
I think there are two special traits of France, that are less represented in other eastern European countries, if we think about, one of our key European challenges, it is the very high energy costs that we have across the continent.
We all would agree that we bet on renewable energies on energy conversion storage, et cetera, et cetera, but in France, there is still this enormously strong lobby on nuclear and the Germans, for example, don’t understand the French at all, and why they like it so much.
So, to give some spice to the discussion, one question could be for a dependable baseload energy supply, with the still rapidly ramping electricity needs of reshored industry, and all those data centers all filled with NVIDIA GPUs. Is nuclear required and, do SMRs play a role.
I’m seeing that because you could invite ORANO or EDF. One could invite a couple of the SMR players to have a very lively discussion that you would not have anywhere else, nuclear is part of the energy mix of the future.
Just what food for thought. And the other one is different. Where we’re France, again, France has built a very, very close and tight relationship between the 5-6 major defense players that you have, SAFRAN, THALES, et cetera. And your startup in VC community. The rest of Europe is only catching up to that. I know continuously being invited by defense organizations, contractors that want to talk about dual use technologies and investing in dual use technologies.
France, as I learned a couple of weeks ago with an organization, with, one of the defense players is advanced here. You have seemingly you have found the model how to establish these collaborations between this open innovation platform, between your Big Defense Corporates and the startup community. Something that the US has done in the last 30 years and trained it extremely well. And we probably should learn.
And that is something that I think you could definitely demonstrate at the French conference; I’d be hard pressed to find more than three German participants who could talk with credibility about this topic. Yeah This would be special. You would not find this anywhere else.
T.M. Ravi presents four key discussion topics: Gen AI, climate, health (specifically cancer), and defense. He emphasizes that Gen AI and infrastructure extend beyond GPUs to include middleware, new-gen operating systems, and a data layer for Large Language Models (LLMs). Ravi underscores the importance of integrating infrastructure with applications and improving operations, coding, R&D, and design. He highlights the CEO of Nvidia’s statement that 30% of new code at Google is Gen AI-generated, indicating significant advancements. Discussions also touch on vertical and horizontal applications, providing ample material for debate.
T.M RAVI
Maybe, at least, I cheated I have maybe four topics. one is kind of more fundamental, which is Gen AI, that everyone’s spoken about, and then three sort of fundamental issues of our time, Climate, health cancer and defence.
And on the Gen AI side, when it comes to infrastructure, it’s not just GPUs. So, it’s kind of the middleware that is going to be an emergence of new gen OS. There’s a whole new data layer to make the data ready for LLM.
So, so there’s a lot to discuss in the infrastructure side, but also kind of, like the, structuring the judge propose of infrastructure plus applications and use cases, You know, the use cases applications, just operations, how operations going to fundamentally kind of improve. You know, there was discussion of coding. And so just R&D and design substantially changing.
I do largely agree with the quote from the CEO of Nvidia. Already we are hearing that 30% of the code at Google, the new code is Gen AI generated.
And it’s there’s just a lot going on there. And then the kind of vertical and horizontal applications. So, I think I think we have a good, good lot of meat here to debate.
Francois Tison challenges Nvidia’s viewpoint, advocating for less compute power to sustain the planet. He sees a global shift towards frugal computing and believes Europe’s engineering strengths position it well for reindustrialization.
Dieter Kraft highlights the trend towards more efficient computing, particularly on the edge, and its potential to reshape architectures. Both identify these topics as key for discussion at the INPHO event, emphasizing collaboration to address challenges and seize opportunities.
FRANCOIS TISON
I think the comment of the Nvidia guys is extremely arrogant and goes. You always complete, completely contrary to where, where we’re going. I mean, there’s no way in Hell, you know.
The more you increase the level of abstraction, the more compute you need to achieve simple tasks, and we don’t need more compute to achieve simple tasks. We need less compute to achieve simple tasks, because the, you know, our planet cannot sustain more compute. So, I think I do think that, know, as I said in the beginning, we did a lot of CLEAN TECHS a lot.
In 2005, 2010, it was really, it was not the right time. I think now, we’re in an environment where both the public and the public at both ends, so, the consumers and the politicians that represent the consumers, are now extremely aware, and are pushing us and are pushing everyone to move into more frugal, way of consuming, and more frugal, ways of computing, cleaner, electricity, recycling, et cetera, et cetera.
Net zero, but beyond net zero or just a more frugal economy. Generally speaking, and we’re talking about the reindustrialization of Europe. I think those two subjects are linked, because in order to be more frugal to recycle more, we’re going to need to promote with smarter, smarter solutions, more engineering precision, engineering, stuff that mixes, engine, mechanic, precision mechanics, and Chemistry to produce, energy. Store energy, etcetera, etcetera.
And this is one of the traditional strengths of Europe. There are two places in the world where, where these technologies are really strong. It’s Europe, around the Alps, Austria, Switzerland, Germany, Italy, France, that area, and Japan.
But, but, Europe is one of the strong areas in the world in terms of Engineering on these, on these topics, so, I do think that reindustrilaisation and going towards smarter, more efficient solutions and a more frugal economy, those are things that play to Europe strengths, and they go together, and I think these would be certainly, one of the interesting topics to cover. AT INPHO
DIETER KRAFT
But think it’s, it’s indeed interlinked between, let’s say, more computing but also more efficient computing.
which leads to a trend I tend to observe, not really sure if it’s already a trend, but what we see is, in different European countries. Netherlands and Christian knows about that or Dresden, efficiency on the edge, AI with components.
Also, hardware investments, which are more or less enabling on the edge, computing with much more efficiency, than in the past.
And that totally changes the architecture, or might change the architecture, And might also, let us think about what can we do in order to lower down the power consumption of distributed computing?
That is something where we have a deeper look. And I think it’s potentially a point for discussion in the INPHO event because that is, for me, something, what is really differentiating, and where we need syndicates. Which can go together that way, might be capital intensive, but it might be huge in the impact.
Mathieu Costes highlights the evolving computing landscape, emphasizing Quantum Computing and emerging hardware technologies. He discusses the importance of these advancements for Venture Capital investments, particularly in early-stage ventures. Costes also underscores the need for software orchestration in hybrid architectures and the urgency for sustainability in data center operations.
MATHIEU COSTES
One thing, one theme that I think, resonates with what we discussed over the last few minutes, is the world of compute because, obviously Quantum Computing and the world of hardware is evolving. Who will win the race between ion trap, neutral Atom, and others? I don’t know, but things are progressing heavily.
If you think compute, we’ll go to the known world of CPUs that measure low consumption CPUs of tomorrow, GPUs with the Nvidia story that could enable AI and other stuff, QPU is quantum, The world of Neuromorphic chips may come in, and finally mature.
Then we see the world of photonics, that may be much faster to move a photon, to save time when latency and speed is critical and Think about a DNA based storage and chemistry-based computing that could offer unprecedented, paralyzed tasks. So, the world of compute, starting with the hardware, to me, is the key element that is relevant for Venture Capital, especially in early stage.
And on that one, you could even see the world of software to orchestrate between Solver, and the world of workload scheduler in this new hybrid architecture, will have a key role to play. This is a this is a global problem. Because obviously we know the world of AI, which generate a huge volume of workload. between that one, weather forecasts, scientific computing and whatever computing to be needed tomorrow. I think we’ve got a very promising field to share news and hopefully, too, deploy more capital into in the coming years.
I would even mentioned, sustainability, how to have datacenters, CPU, GPUs, QPUs, that will not absorb the full volume of green electricity produced. You see what happened in Ireland a couple of months ago, they stopped the growth and expansion of the datacenters. Say, they are consuming 18% of the electricity generated into the country, which is exactly the same level of the energy electricity consumed by the citizens. So things will have to change.
Blumorpho works accross the whole blue economy ecosystem. We are happy to have you involved in more actions.
A summit focused on semicon investment, to contribute to a strong and sovereign European value chain.
Innovation partner bringing access to disruption in technology, market and business model for strategic and bankable projects.
Copyright © 2025 BLUMORPHO/Q.L, All Rights Reserved.